<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://blog.roboteducation.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Mark Guzdial&#039;s blog</title>
 <link>http://blog.roboteducation.org/blog/4</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Teaching Computer Science with Robotics vs. Teaching Robotics</title>
 <link>http://blog.roboteducation.org/node/4</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Deepak Kumar and I had a good Skype conversation yesterday (Thursday 13 July) about getting started with the curriculum design for the introductory course. We plan to trial the course this January, so we have a lot of ground to cover in a short time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The really important point that we both agree on is the IPRE courses are about &lt;em&gt;learning Computer Science&lt;/em&gt; not &lt;em&gt;learning Robotics&lt;/em&gt;.  Deepak explicitly said that robotics and cognitive science should take a back seat in these courses.  Our goal is to teach computer science -- using robotics and cognitive science as inspiration, but also drawing on computational science and other domains.  We&#039;re using robots as a &lt;em&gt;strategy&lt;/em&gt; for learning and teaching -- a place to draw interesting examples and a way to make the computing concrete and tangible.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.roboteducation.org/node/4&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://blog.roboteducation.org/node/4#comment</comments>
 <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 06:35:38 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mark Guzdial</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4 at http://blog.roboteducation.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
